Previous Page  38 / 232 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 38 / 232 Next Page
Page Background

37

DENVER MUSEUM OF NATURE & SCIENCE

REPORTS

|

No. 3, July 2, 2016

20

th

International Congress of Arachnology

limit (digging males: 0.33±0.09, n=14, non-digging

males: 0.42±0.16, n=10; p=0.08). We are increasing

sample sizes to confirm whether male burrow digging

implies an energetic cost in this species, or if it is exclu-

sively performed by males with good body condition, for

whom digging causes no impact in immune responses.

Keywords: lytic activity, immune functions, trade-off,

burrows

Oral presentation

Complex mating, high male sperm effort

and strong female control in a wolf spider

Maria J. Albo, Fernando G. Costa

Laboratorio de Etología, Ecología y Evolución, Insti-

tuto de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable.

Montevideo, Uruguay

mjalbograna@gmail.com

Post-copulatory sexual selection is often expected in poly-

androus species and it is especially promising to study in

species with complex mating patterns. In the wolf spider

Schizocosa malitiosa

males perform two different consec-

utive copulatory patterns, which are characterized mainly

by different number of pedipalp insertions. The full mating

last 100 min, 80% of total insertions occur in pattern 1 and

20% in pattern 2. Both patterns produce similar number of

offspring, but pattern 1 induce higher female reluctance

to remating than pattern 2. By interrupting matings after

pattern 1 and then offering the male a second female,

which received only pattern 2, we investigated if the

complex copulatory patterns are related to male sperm

investment and sperm storage by females. We hypothesized

that males strategically allocate the sperm during pattern

1 causing female reluctance. Second, by mating males

with recently thawed, dead females we tested the possible

active roles of females in sperm storage. Our findings show

that males transfer in total 71% of the sperm available in

their pedipalps, being higher but not significant in pattern

1 than pattern 2. Females drastically reduced the amount

of sperm stored in their spermathecae and such control is

stronger in pattern 1 compared to pattern 2. We propose

that cryptic female choice is a main factor driving male

sperm effort, and differences in copulatory patterns among

males would result in wide variation in their reproductive

success. Receptive inhibiting substances rather than the

sperm itself may be acting during pattern 1, but active

female reduction in the amount of ejaculate that reaches

her spermathecae most probably help to reduce her reluc-

tance to remating.

Keywords: copulatory patterns, cryptic female choice,

sexual behavior, wolf spiders

Poster presentation

The fear of spiders: the effect of a single

talk on school children

Maria J. Albo

1

, Laura Montes de Oca

1

and Ignacio

Estevan

2

1

Laboratorio de Etología, Ecología y Evolución, Instituto

de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable (IIBCE),

Montevideo, Uruguay;

2

Instituto de Fundamentos y

Métodos en Psicología, Facultad de Psicología, Universi-

dad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay

mjalbograna@gmail.com

Loved and feared, spiders have been always mysterious

animals for human societies. The majority of species are

harmless, but probably due to their venom they are gener-

ally feared and disliked in many cultures. However, spiders

use the venom to capture prey or defend themselves

from predators, while only 1% are fatally dangerous for

humans. In this project we were interested in examining

children’s knowledge and attitudes about spiders as well

as in measuring the impact of our talks on their point

of view and behavior. We surveyed 172 children from 9

school groups (10 and 11 years old) visiting the Institute

(IIBCE) in 2015. We performed a multiple choice survey

before any knowledge was given, including identification

of native animals (particularly arachnids), whether they

are afraid or not to spiders, if they like them or not, and

what is their reaction if they spot one nearby. Afterwards,

we divided them in two groups: children receiving a talk

about spiders and other arachnids (spider group), chil-

dren receiving a talk in another topic (control group).

The same survey was repeated 30 days later at school by

their own teacher. We compared pre and post-responses

both within and between treatment groups. The results