Previous Page  50 / 232 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 50 / 232 Next Page
Page Background

49

DENVER MUSEUM OF NATURE & SCIENCE

REPORTS

|

No. 3, July 2, 2016

University, 26 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA

lbenavidessilva@g.harvard.edu

The spider family Mimetidae, commonly referred to as

“pirate spiders” due to their aggressive mimicry behav-

ior, has world-wide distribution, with the highest species

diversity in Central and tropical South America. Although

Mimetidae were thought to be exclusively araneophagic,

mimetids can be kleptoparasitic on the webs of other

spiders and can also feed upon other arthropods. The family

includes 158 described species and 13 genera. Currently, the

relationships among genera within the family are poorly

understood. To date, phylogenetic analyses have been

limited to morphological characters and outgroup sampling

has lacked many key taxa. Here we present the results of the

first molecular analysis of the family sampling 92 mimetid

terminals and 119 outgroup taxa from 12 families. With

this data set we aimed to (1) test the monophyly of the

family, (2) test the monophyly of mimetid genera, and (3)

examine the relationships among genera. Using data from

six standard molecular markers we estimated the phylogeny

of Mimetidae using parsimony, maximum likelihood, and

Bayesian inference methods. Across analyses our results

show broad consensus for the following relationships:

Gelanor

is monophyletic and sister to the rest of the family.

Ero

is monophyletic and sister to a lineage that includes

a new genus described elsewhere (previously

Mimetus

),

Australomimetus

and

Mimetus

. However the placement

of different clades of Mimetus (Neotropical, Indomalayan,

North American, Malagasy) varies under different methods

of analysis with our current mimetid sample. Using the

molecular phylogeny as a guide, we identify potential mor-

phological synapomorphies for all mimetid genera. We also

present new natural history data demonstrating that at least

some mimetids use maternal care for eggs and offspring.

Keywords: Molecular systematics, morphology, pirate

spiders, maternal care

Oral presentation

Documenting diversity: surveying British

Columbia’s spider fauna

Robb Bennett, Claudia Copley, Darren Copley

Royal British Columbia Museum, 675 Belleville Street

Victoria, British Columbia, V8W 9W2, Canada

robb.bennett@shaw.ca

In 2006, the Royal British Columbia Museum began system-

atically documenting the full diversity of British Columbia’s

spider fauna. Museum specimens and literature records

were used to update an existing checklist and identify poorly

sampled habitats in British Columbia. Annual field surveys

of spiders, primarily targeting alpine and subalpine habitats,

began in 2008 and have resulted in a large number of speci-

mens added to the collection including many new provincial,

national, and Nearctic records as well as numerous unde-

scribed species. Databased spider specimens have increased

from nearly 4300 in 2008 to about 9000 in 2016. Data from

many specimens, however, remain unrecorded and cur-

rently (2016) the museum collection houses approximately

18000 vials estimated to contain over 90000 specimens.

The number of species recorded in British Columbia has

climbed from 570 in 1988 to more than 850. Over 70 of the

new records are Canadian or Nearctic firsts. The progress of

this work has attracted regional, national, and international

attention resulting in donations of important voucher speci-

mens and other spider material; collaborative research with

other scientists on spider ecology, taxonomy, systematics,

and faunistics; and recognition of British Columbia as an

important area of Nearctic spider diversity.

Keywords: collections, curation, alpine, Beringia,

collaboration

Oral presentation

Changes in mating system with the evolution

of sociality leads to depleted genomic diver-

sity at both population and species level

Trine Bilde

1

, Virginia Settepani

1

, Mads F. Schou

1

,

Michelle Greve

2

, Lena Grinsted

3

, Jesper Bechsgaard

1

1

Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Ny

Munkegade 116, building 1540, 8000 Aarhus C,

Denmark;

2

Department of Plant Science, University of

Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield 0028, South Africa;

3

School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, John

Maynard Smith Building, Brighton BN1 9QG, UK

trine.bilde@bios.au.dk

20

th

International Congress of Arachnology