Previous Page  51 / 232 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 51 / 232 Next Page
Page Background

The evolution of sociality in animals is frequently associated

with a shift from outcrossing to inbreeding. This suggests

that short-term benefits outweigh costs of inbreeding. Over

evolutionary time, inbreeding populations experience a

severe reduction in effective population size increasing the

rate of genetic drift and accelerating loss of genetic diversity.

This process predicts reduced evolutionary potential and ele-

vated extinction risk. Empirical evidence for the evolutionary

dead end hypothesis comes mainly from phylogenetic analy-

ses; quantitative estimates of genome-wide diversity in

species with contrasting mating systems are scarce. We

tested the combined effects of sociality and mating system

on genome wide diversity using a comparative RAD sequenc-

ing approach. Our analysis included multiple populations

of each of three independent sister-species pairs of social

inbreeding and subsocial outcrossing

Stegodyphus

spiders

and a subsocial outgroup. Genetic diversity in the social

species was extraordinarily low: heterozygosity and within

population genetic diversity were 6–10 fold lower in inbreed-

ing compared to outcrossing species, and demographic

modelling revealed a tenfold reduction in effective popula-

tion size of inbreeding populations. Species-wide genetic

diversity depends on population divergence and viability of

genetic lineages. Population genomic patterns were con-

sistent with high lineage turnover, which homogenizes the

genetic structure that builds up between inbreeding popula-

tions, ultimately depleting genetic diversity at the species

level. Indeed, species-wide genetic diversity of social species

was 5-8 times lower than that of subsocial species, and

amongst the lowest estimated for any species. This severe loss

of genome-wide diversity is likely to affect all social inbreed-

ing species, limiting their evolutionary potential as predicted

by the evolutionary dead end hypothesis.

Keywords: mating systems, inbreeding, comparative pop-

ulation genomics, sociality, social spiders,

Stegodyphus

Oral presentation

Obscure features of Solifugae: compara-

tive morphology of the lateral eyespots

Tharina L. Bird

1,2

, Sierra Little

2

1

Botswana International University of Science and

Technology (BIUST), P/Bag 16, Palapye, Botswana;

2

Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-

1177, USA

tharinab@gmail.com

Lateral eyes in Arachnida are presumed plesiomorphic.

Photosensitive areas without lenses placed laterally on

the prosoma were recorded for various arachnid orders

(e.g. Ricinulei, Scorpiones, Shizomida) and their homol-

ogy with lateral eyes are generally assumed. The presence

of lateral eyespots in the anterolateral propeltidial lobes

of Solifugae (solifuges, sunspiders, false spiders) are

often overlooked and even their basic external mor-

phology is little known. This is notwithstanding their

potential importance within the Arachnida towards

interordinal, and within the Solifugae towards intraor-

dinal, phylogenetic relationships. In this study, eyespots

were examined in representative of major Solifugae taxa.

Eyespots were generally easily distinguishable either in

lateral view, ventral view, or both. Broad trends in eyespot

configuration were found at family level, especially

regarding number and relative placement, but also to an

extend in shape, size and reflectiveness.

Keywords: comparative morphology, homology, photo-

sensitive, lateral eyes

Poster presentation

Termite-eating spiders (Ammoxenidae:

Ammoxenus

): distribution and coexistence

of cryptic species

Tharina L. Bird

1,2

, Christopher Bird

3

, John Irish

4

,

A.S. Dippenaar-Schoeman

5

1

Department of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology,

Botswana International University of Science and

Technology (BIUST), Private Bag 16, Palapye, Botswana;

2

Department of Arachnology, National Museum of Namibia,

P.O. Box 1203/ Robert Mugabe Av. 59, Windhoek, Namibia;

3

Geospace International, P.O. Box 7782, Lynnwood Ridge,

0040, South Africa;

4

Namibia Biodiversity Database,

biodiversity.org.na,

Windhoek, Namibia;

5

Biosystematics:

Arachnology, ARC–Plant Protection Research Institute,

Private Bag X134, Queenswood, 0121, South Africa

tharinab@gmail.com

50

DENVER MUSEUM OF NATURE & SCIENCE

REPORTS

|

No. 3, July 2, 2016

Cushing