Previous Page  72 / 232 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 72 / 232 Next Page
Page Background

71

DENVER MUSEUM OF NATURE & SCIENCE

REPORTS

|

No. 3, July 2, 2016

20

th

International Congress of Arachnology

Student - Oral presentation

Straightening out the pseudoscorpion

backbone

Julia G. Cosgrove

1

, Mark S Harvey

2

, Gonzalo Giribet

1

1

Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University,

26 Oxford St, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA;

2

Western

Australian Museum, Locked Bag 49, Welshpool DC, WA

6986, Australia

juliacosgrove@g.harvard.edu

Over the last century there have been four main

hypotheses proposed regarding the classification of

groups within the arachnid order Pseudoscorpiones:

Chamberlin, 1931; Beier, 1932; Muchmore, 1982; and

Harvey, 1992. While these classification schemes are

primarily concordant, especially in contrast to the

multitude of ideas proposed in the 19th century, the

placement of a few particular groups continues to

be debated, notably the superfamily Feaelloidea and

families Cheiridiidae, Pseudochiridiidae, and Sterno-

phoridae. Recently, molecular data have begun to shed

new light on our understanding of pseudoscorpion

phylogenetics, however relationships between some key

families and superfamilies remain unresolved. We have

generated de novo transcriptomic data from 23 species

representing 18 of the 26 currently recognized families

in order to infer the pseudoscorpion phylogeny using a

variety of phylogenetic inference methods and models of

evolution. This data will also be used to estimate diver-

gence times within Pseudoscorpiones and to compare

rates of molecular evolution between lineages. We will

discuss our findings as well as the implications of a

well-resolved and dated pseudoscorpion phylogeny that

will provide the necessary backbone from which we can

investigate the evolution of morphological characters

including silk and venom, as well as mating and disper-

sal behaviors.

Keywords: phylogenomics, pseudoscorpiones, systematics,

divergence dating

Oral presentation

Genetic mosaic among ecologically similar

species within an adaptive radiation of

Hawaiian spiders

Darko D. Cotoras

1,7

, Michael S. Brewer

2

, Ke Bi

3,4

, Stefan

Prost

1

, David R. Lindberg

1,5

, Rosemary G. Gillespie

6

1

Department of Integrative Biology, University of Cali-

fornia, 3060 Valley Life Sciences Building, Berkeley, CA

94720-3140, USA;

2

Department of Biology, East Carolina

University, 1000 E 5th St., Greenville, NC 27858-4353,

USA;

3

Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 3101 Valley Life

Sciences Building, University of California, Berkeley, CA

94720-3160, USA;

4

Computational Genomics Resource

Laboratory (CGRL), California Institute for Quantitative

Biosciences (QB3), University of California, Berkeley, CA

94720-3102, USA;

5

Museum of Paleontology, University

of California, 1101 Valley Life Sciences Building,

Berkeley, CA 94720, USA;

6

Department of Environmental

Science, University of California, 137 Mulford Hall,

Berkeley, CA 94720-3114, USA;

7

Current affiliation:

Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Univer-

sity of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064

USA; Department of Entomology Center for Comparative

Genomics, California Academy of Sciences, 55 Music

Concourse Drive, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA

darkocotoras@gmail.com

The interplay between isolation and time in the ini-

tiation of adaptive radiation is central to understanding

the dynamics of rapid diversification events. The chrono-

sequence of the Hawaiian Islands provides an ideal system

to explore this fundamental process. Here, we focus on

a radiation of long jawed spiders, genus

Tetragnatha

, to

examine the genetic signatures of early events of speciation.

Specifically we investigated how ecologically similar species

have differentiated genetically in the course of an adap-

tive radiation. Using a transcriptome-based exon capture

approach, we examined relationships between populations

of three closely related species (

T. brevignatha, T. waika-

moi and T. macracantha

) from the youngest of islands of

the Hawaiian chain, Lana’i, Maui and Big Island. The data

shows that the originally described three species could be

separated in at least five genetic clades. A key finding is that